<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Economy Guy &#187; GDP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.economyguy.com/category/gdp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.economyguy.com</link>
	<description>Economic News For Everybody....by Tom Harvey and Cyrus Uible</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hear That Sucking Sound?</title>
		<link>http://www.economyguy.com/hear-that-sucking-sound/</link>
		<comments>http://www.economyguy.com/hear-that-sucking-sound/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 20:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cuible</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economyguy.com/?p=1016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the closing statistics for our key indicators (7/29/11): DJ30 – 12,143   down 96 US Treasury 10 Year Bond – 2.81%    down 0.15% USDEUR  -  1.4387 Gold &#8211; $1626     up $12 Oil &#8211; $95.88    down $1.56 Gold hit a new inter-day HIGH of $1633.  Wow – I am happy for all of you who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">Here are the closing statistics for our key indicators (7/29/11):</p>
<p>DJ30 – 12,143   down 96<br />
US Treasury 10 Year Bond – 2.81%    down 0.15%<br />
USDEUR  -  1.4387<br />
Gold &#8211; $1626     up $12<br />
Oil &#8211; $95.88    down $1.56</p>
<p>Gold hit a new inter-day HIGH of $1633.  Wow – I am happy for all of you who are holding gold right now.</p>
<p>Bonds gained enormously today on the risk – as money flowed into  Treasuries –  people were driven by the poor US economy (see GDP story  below).  This lowered interest rates by 0.15% &#8211; amazing. Oil fell also  on a poor US economy.  The Dollar fell slightly.  Stocks continued their  fall.</p>
<p><strong>GDP – that sucking sound&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
</strong><br />
You saw it on the news – GDP was 1.3% for the 2nd Q 2011.  And, the  bigger news was the 1st Q was revised down from 1.9% to 0.4%.  Wow –  that means we were awfully close to a declining growth rate in the 1st Q  – aka a recession.</p>
<p>Well, you think that 1.3% isn’t bad when compared to the 0.4% &#8211; do you?  Here is the truth.  It Stinks!!!!!!</p>
<p>And, just when you thought it couldn’t get worse – it got worse.  One  lesson from these numbers is that you can’t trust those numbers when  they first come out.  Who would have guessed that the GDP number could  drop from 1.9% to 0.4% on a revision.</p>
<p>Here is one of those dirty little secrets.  The GDP numbers are not  inflation adjusted – in other words, when this year’s GDP Dollars are  compared to last year’s GDP Dollars to calculate the GDP % growth rate –  they use actual Dollars at that time.  The Dollars are not adjusted for  inflation.  So, what? &#8211; I hear you say.  Okay, you have a point.  This  is the way GDP is calculated every time – so why make a big deal about  it???</p>
<p>I am making a point out of it to show you that when you DO adjust for  inflation – which is blazing along at about 4% right now – the actual  (inflation-adjusted) growth is NEGATIVE.  The only reason we are having  growth at all is that inflation is making the numbers bigger – <strong>ARTIFICIALLY</strong>.   This is one of the big benefits that politicians have when they can  stand in front of the microphone and declare that “growth” is happening –  and they get to do it because of inflation.  Inflation distorts the  truth – in addition to kicking you in your back pocket (or purse – so it  won’t hurt as much).</p>
<p>What caused this GDP slowdown?  Well, the FED and the economists have  stated over and over again that the slowdown was caused by “transitory”  things like the Japanese earthquake and higher gasoline prices – and it  will jump right back to its great (???) growth rate soon.  I draw an  entirely different conclusion from these “experts.”  I believe that our  economic recovery is FRAGILE – and if a little hiccup in Japan or gas  prices can make it almost go into a recession – our economy is going to  tank even further as those “transitory” things keep happening.  For  example, what happens from our Debt Cap talks?  Will they cause a  decline in governmental spending – ergo a reduction in GDP?  That would  be transitory too, wouldn’t it?  In fact, everything is transitory –  because everything can and does change in the future.  So, I think those  experts are just pulling the wool over our eyes.</p>
<p>I would expect economyguy readers to be able to deduce by themselves  that higher gasoline prices have no impact on GDP.  Yes, people do spend  more money filling their tank up.  And, they spend less money on  something else.  The net is zero.  So, where does the logic come from by  the experts?  Remember to think for yourselves and you will be able to  protect your and your family’s financial future.</p>
<p>Let’s dial down into the 2nd Q GDP number.  What was the biggest  contributor to the growth?  It was an improvement in the Net Exports  component of the GDP equation.  In other words, by fixing our export  problem a little – the US managed to help its GDP – and this factor  helped our GDP the MOST.  It was not internal spending, or investment,  or government spending (thank goodness), it was an improvement in net  exports.  Here is the other side of this coin – net exports is fickle  and what goes up, can come down.  Our net exports improved in 2 Q by  lower oil prices – but oil prices are now rising – think about it.</p>
<p>The governmental spending component of the GDP equation declined.  It  wasn’t the Federal Government, of course.  It was the State, County and  Local governments spending less.  We see this showing up in the  unemployment numbers too as the biggest component of unemployment growth  is from state/county/local government.</p>
<p><strong>Europe isn’t over yet&#8230;&#8230;<br />
</strong><br />
Even though the headlines highlight the US, Europe continues to percolate in a threatening manner – threatening to your wealth.</p>
<p></span></p>
<ol>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">Moody’s is threatening to downgrade Spanish debt from AAA (sound familiar to the US?). </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">The banks still must “voluntarily” roll over their depreciating Greek bonds – so this story hasn’t fully played out yet. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">The politics in Germany are volcanic – as Merkel is trying to keep the lid on German hatred of bailing out Greeks. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">France has been threatened with a downgrade unless the ACTUALLY follow through on their budget cuts. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">French banks are being scrutinized for bad loans – and they don’t look too good. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">Ireland is considering going back to the EU and telling them they want a deal like Greece’s deal.<br />
</span></li>
</ol>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><br />
Any of these details could raise its ugly head and continue with a Euro  crisis – and threatened US banks – and threatened your wealth&#8230;.  Just  because we don’t see Europe in the headlines doesn’t mean that bad  things aren’t happening over there.</p>
<p><strong>Fannie and Freddie&#8230;&#8230;<br />
</strong><br />
Just a reminder that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are now run by the US  Government, and that while the taxpayer wasn’t responsible for them in  the past, as of 2008 we are now responsible for any losses incurred by  these Government Service Agencies (GSA).</p>
<p>What’s the risk?  Well, jointly they hold about $5 TRILLION worth of  mortgages.  If they all go bad, you can add that amount to the Debt we  owe.  So, far the government has not added anything to our Debt to  account for Fannie/Freddie losses.  While the loss could be no where  near $5 TRILLION, it does come into the hundreds of Billions of Dollars –  and that ain’t hay.</p>
<p>So, just when you think our leaders have their hands around the problem –  it is important to remember that they can’t even define the problem –  let alone get their hands around it.</p>
<p><strong>Some Random Thoughts on Rating Agencies&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
</strong><br />
Let’s use our ‘out of the box’ thinking right now.  The S&amp;P Rating  Agency has threatened to lower the AAA debt rating on US Treasury debt.   This is because we have such a large debt and no plan on reducing it in  the future.</p>
<p>Do you think any other nations have less risk than the United States  when it comes to being able to pay back its loans?  How about France?   How about Germany?  How about Japan?  How about the UK?</p>
<p>My conclusion is that the US is still a lower risk than other nations.   The US Dollar is the reserve currency of the world, and that also gives  it some weight.</p>
<p>So, the fact that S&amp;P is threatening to lower the US rating means  that they also must be considering lowering a bunch of other nations’  credit rating too, or they are incompetent (a definite possibility).   When you consider that the entire world is drowning in debt – all  nations have the same problem – just to different extents.  Don’t get  too excited about a credit rating downgrade – it is just a sign of our  times and the very poor financial advice given to the world over the  past 50 years.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.economyguy.com/hear-that-sucking-sound/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Weaker</title>
		<link>http://www.economyguy.com/getting-weaker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.economyguy.com/getting-weaker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 20:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cuible</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economyguy.com/?p=957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the closing statistics for our key indicators: DJ30 – 12.605   up 45 US Treasury 10 Year Bond – 3.17%    no change USDEUR  -  1.4310 Gold &#8211; $1491     down $4 Oil &#8211; $98.49    down $1.61 Lots of swings in the price of our indicators.  Go no where stocks and bonds.  Gold and oil establishing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">Here are the closing statistics for our key indicators:</p>
<p>DJ30 – 12.605   up 45<br />
US Treasury 10 Year Bond – 3.17%    no change<br />
USDEUR  -  1.4310<br />
Gold &#8211; $1491     down $4<br />
Oil &#8211; $98.49    down $1.61</p>
<p>Lots of swings in the price of our indicators.  Go no where stocks and  bonds.  Gold and oil establishing a sideways movement.  The Dollar  starting to fall.</p>
<p><strong>Jobless Claims&#8230;..<br />
</strong><br />
Jobless Claims came in today at 409,000 claims with the 4 week moving  average at 420,000 claims (a better estimate of the claims as it  smoothes out the volatility).</p>
<p>This is still a fairly high level of people claiming unemployment  benefits, and points to our weak economy.  The big numbers were claimed  to be caused by auto workers laid off because of the part shortage  caused by the Japanese earthquake.</p>
<p>Bottom Line – the US economy is weak and becoming weaker.  Remember the  GDP growth from 1Q 2011 was 1.8%, and down from the previous quarter.</p>
<p><strong>2Q GDP estimate&#8230;..<br />
</strong><br />
The data is starting to come in indicating that the 2Q GDP growth will be less than anyone has estimated.</p>
<p>The Philadelphia FED report showed that factory output was much less  than anticipated – as reported today – and slumping to a 7 month low.   Auto output declined 8.9% last month and is blamed on the spare parts  loss from Japan.  It is believed that factory output fall is temporary  and will rebound later this year.</p>
<p>However, housing activity looks like it will stay with us for a long  while.  Housing starts are at such a low level that you would need to  look at the post-WWII level to see so few houses being built.  While  this is good for working off the backlog of houses for sale, it doesn’t  put anybody to work building homes.  The backlog of foreclosed  properties is far from worked off, and states are still suing banks over  their illegal methods of foreclosing.  This just means it takes longer  to work out all these problem properties.  (My anticipation is that the  housing market won’t turn around until 2013 at the earliest.)</p>
<p><strong>President Obama and the Middle East Speech&#8230;&#8230;<br />
</strong><br />
President Obama made a major speech today saying we should help Egypt  and Tunisia by giving the Billions of Dollars in aid and forgiven loans.</p>
<p>Where does this money come from and how does it impact GDP?  (A question for our times.)</p>
<p>As we are borrowing money today, any new money (and his request is for  new money) would have to be borrowed – 100% borrowed – to pay for the  aid.  Many will ask “Why are we borrowing money – possibly from abroad –  to give it away to foreign countreis?”  This is a valid question and  goes to the heart of our foreign policy.</p>
<p>Foreign aid is a little tricky to think about when it comes to foreign  aid.  On the surface, it looks like it comes (or adds to) “G” in the GDP  Equation – and you would conclude it increases GDP.  But, the money is  not being spent in America, and it is going abroad.  Isn’t this just  like an “Import”?  When we import things, we get the goods, and the  money goes abroad.  In this case, we get nothing, and the money goes  abroad.</p>
<p>So, I would conclude that all foreign aid is something that is added to  the “imports” part of Net Exports – and is a total negative on our GDP.</p>
<p><strong>Japan’s 1Q GDP&#8230;..<br />
</strong><br />
Japan came in today with a MINUS 0.9% for their GDP growth.  This was  the result of the earthquake and tsunami that stopped the production of  so many manufacturing plants and associated exports.  This negative GDP  will undoubtedly continue into the 2Q, and will be placing Japan firmly  in the grip of a real recession.</p>
<p><strong>FED Watch&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
</strong><br />
It is fun to read the FED minutes when they are released.  The latest  ones released talked about a discussion within the FOMC on how and when  to reverse the “monetary easing” that is taking place – i.e. QE2.  The  general consensus is for the FED to do the following, in the order  stated:<br />
</span></p>
<ol>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">Stop  reinvesting the income derived from its assets (US Treasury bills and  Mortgage Securities) &#8211; as you remember the FED is currently using those  funds to purchase more US Treasuries – a sort of continuation of QE2. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">Increase Interest Rates – like the FED Funds Rate </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">Sell its assets – US Treasuries and Mortgage Securities.<br />
</span></li>
</ol>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><br />
None of these actions are surprises as I’ve talked about all of them previously.  The order is the only real news here.</p>
<p>The timing of these actions was not addressed and undoubtedly has a big disagreement within the FED.</p>
<p>My person belief is that later this summer, the economy will start to  decline, and the FED will decide to do nothing, or will decide to  initiate a QE3 program.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.economyguy.com/getting-weaker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google and GDP</title>
		<link>http://www.economyguy.com/google-and-gdp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.economyguy.com/google-and-gdp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 22:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cuible</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economyguy.com/?p=955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the closing statistics for our key indicators: DJ30 – 14,479   down 69 US Treasury 10 Year Bond – 3.12%    down 0.03% USDEUR  -  1.4227 Gold &#8211; $1484     down $7 Oil &#8211; $97.11    down $0.26 Stocks continue their meltdown.  The Dollar has stalled against the Euro, but still gaining against the Yen.  Interest rates [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">Here are the closing statistics for our key indicators:</p>
<p>DJ30 – 14,479   down 69<br />
US Treasury 10 Year Bond – 3.12%    down 0.03%<br />
USDEUR  -  1.4227<br />
Gold &#8211; $1484     down $7<br />
Oil &#8211; $97.11    down $0.26</p>
<p>Stocks continue their meltdown.  The Dollar has stalled against the  Euro, but still gaining against the Yen.  Interest rates continued to  fall today.  Gold and oil are consolidating right now for their next leg  higher in the future.</p>
<p><strong>Use the GDP Equation in Washington&#8230;..<br />
</strong><br />
I just read an article about a deadlock in Washington between the Obama  White House and the Congressional Republicans.  This deadlock shows that  our leadership does not understand the GDP Equation, and it provides a  great example of how it could be used.</p>
<p>The White House is sitting on 3 Trade Agreements (South Korea, Columbia,  plus one other) which will increase exports by $13B.  They are not  passing it to Congress for ratification because they want a (non  related) funding of a payment to workers who are displaced by their jobs  going overseas which costs $800M (yes milliion).  The Republicans won’t  pass that $800M bill because they are hung up on spending more money.</p>
<p>I am very nervous reading an article in the New York Times, so here are my assumptions regarding the numbers:<br />
</span></p>
<ol>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">The $13B and $800M are correct numbers. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">The $13B increase in exports would happen in a single year – and each year. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">There are no associated imports from those countries which counteract the $13B exports – this is the weakest assumption. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">The $800M is a one time expenditure.<br />
</span></li>
</ol>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><br />
So, let’s use the GDP Equation to analyze this situation:<br />
</span></p>
<ol>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">The Net Exports increase by $13B – for every foreseeable year in the future. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">The $800M is a one time increase in “G” </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">The $800M comes from increased taxes – which decreases “C” by $800M, or </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">The $800M comes from increased borrowing – which has no effect (ugh!!!!!) on the GDP Equation for a single year.<br />
</span></li>
</ol>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><br />
Conclusions:<br />
</span></p>
<ol>
<li><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;">GDP  increases either $13.8B or $13B – depending on where the $800 comes  from.  That is great for the economy isn’t it, as this is private  industry work where real workers pay taxes and it doesn’t make  government bigger?<br />
</span></li>
</ol>
<p><span style="font-family: Calibri,Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;"><br />
But, there is one additional consideration to analyze.  How many jobs  does the net exports create?  If we assume that the productivity of the  average American worker is $50,000 – then all we have to do it divide  $13B by $50,000 – and we get 260,000 jobs.</p>
<p>Now, 260,000 jobs is nothing to sneeze about – and I bet that this  doesn’t even enter the discussion on this topic between Congress and the  White House.</p>
<p>Also, the Republicans have stated that they will not increase spending.   And, I have stated that any deal should look at the big picture and not  an individual issue (like this one – which is an excellent issue to  bring up).  So, my recommendation is that this be agreed among the  parties as part of the next “Big Deal” which is the increase in the Debt  Limit discussions.</p>
<p>Thought you would like to see  a real issue using the GDP Equation.  I  find it interesting that this hits in the one big area where progress  can be made in our GDP – the Net Exports component.  When we reduce “G”,  we are going to be reducing GDP accordingly, and the more offsets we  have in increases in Net Exports, the better.  Now you should start  using it when you read or listen to the news.</p>
<p><strong>Google to sell $3B worth of Bonds&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
</strong><br />
Google is sitting on a pile of cash totaling $37B.  Why would it want to  sell $3B worth of its corporate bonds? It clearly doesn’t need the  money.  And, selling bonds for the first time!!!!</p>
<p>Well, it is doing it just like many, many other companies are doing it  right now.  They believe that interest rates are at an all time low, and  they will be going UP in the future.  If they write these IOUs, and  sell them for real money – they can put the money in the bank and pay  the interest on those corporate bonds with inflated Dollars and as  interest rates rise, they will be much better off – giving them a  competitive advantage to the tune of $3B.</p>
<p>Smart companies are doing this right now, as is our Government&#8230;..   They are writing US Treasuries like they are going out of style?   Aren’t they?  The low interest rates is one of the reasons – but not  the driving reason.  The driving reason is the insanity that thinks that  deficit spending is good for the USA.</p>
<p><strong>Supply and Demand&#8230;..<br />
</strong><br />
We are going through a classic supply and demand curve as shown by the  US Gasoline prices.  People have reduced their spending on gasoline each  week for the past 8 weeks.  This is being reported by the credit card  companies who can monitor what is spent by their customers.</p>
<p>As this reduction in demand has taken hold, the price of a gallon of gasoline has started dropping in the past week.</p>
<p>The result shows the typical lag that takes place as the price of  something rises – causes the demand to reduce over time – and then the  price corrects to compensate for the reduced demand.</p>
<p>It’s nice to see this part of our economy not being manipulated as so many other parts are being manipulated.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.economyguy.com/google-and-gdp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government&#8217;s GDP</title>
		<link>http://www.economyguy.com/governments-gdp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.economyguy.com/governments-gdp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.economyguy.com/governments-gdp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The stock market felt the pain of the economy, and fell 206 points today – lots of volatility this week.  Bonds increased in value and ended with the 10 Year Treasury Bond below 4%. Oil and gasoline moved down again today, the Dollar stayed the same and gold rose a little. In the news today&#8230;.. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 11pt"><font face="Verdana"> The stock market felt the pain of the economy, and fell 206 points today – lots of volatility this week.  Bonds increased in value and ended with the 10 Year Treasury Bond below 4%.</p>
<p>Oil and gasoline moved down again today, the Dollar stayed the same and gold rose a little.</p>
<p></font><font face="Verdana"><strong>In the news today&#8230;..<br />
</strong><br />
I love the way the government calculates GDP.  It just keeps revising it until the truth finally comes out.  Here is a great example.  Today, the government declared that 2nd Quarter GDP came in at 1.9%.  This was disappointing to the markets as they expected a much higher number as this was the quarter of the IRS rebate checks!!!!  So, the economy is doing worse than people had expected, or hoped for.  I know you’re not surprised!!!!</p>
<p>AND, at the same time, the government revised the 1st Quarter 2008 GDP to 0.9%, AND revised the 4th Quarter 2007 GDP to –0.2% (it was +0.6% previously).</p>
<p>You see there is a big difference between MINUS and PLUS GDP, because it influences a lot of decision in and outside of government.  So, 4th Quarter GDP was negative???  Remember that two quarters of negative GDP is the classic definition of a RECESSION.  So, if the government revises the 1Q GDP to negative sometime in the future, we would have been in a recession a long time ago.  Truth has a way of raising its ugly head – even through revised figures.</p>
<p>Inflation was reported as +4.2% for 2nd Quarter 2008.  This number is just way too high for the FED, but they can’t do anything about it (like raise interest rates) because they’re stuck in this recession right now.  Wages were up 0.7% in the 2nd Quarter, and this is a low number, so there is no wage inflation going on right now.</p>
<p>Alan Greenspan today said that the housing crisis “was nowhere near the bottom” and also said we are “right on the brink of a recession.”</p>
<p></font><font face="Verdana"><strong>Dinner Conversation Tonight&#8230;.<br />
</strong><br />
The weekly jobless claims for last week came in at 448,000!!!!!!!  Remember to think that anything over 400,000 is just plain bad news for the economy, and further pushes us into the recession.</p>
<p>Here is a graph of the weekly jobless claims made over the past few years, so you can put these statistics into context:</font></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt"><img border="0" width="586" src="http://economyguy.com/images/731jobs.png" alt="Jobless Claims" height="408" /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt"><span style="font-size: 11pt"><font face="Verdana"> Please note the steady rise since July 2007!!!!  You can also see this number is highly volatile, BUT the trend is very clear over the past 9 months.  </p>
<p>The question for you to discuss is “Where will this trend stop?  And, when will it stop??  And, what will make it stop??”</p>
<p></font></span><span style="font-size: 11pt"><br />
<strong><font face="Verdana">Here are today&#8217;s numbers:<br />
Dow Jones 30 Industrial &#8211; 11,378 (down 206 points)<br />
10 Year Treasury Bond – 3.98% (down $0.07)<br />
Euro &#8211; $1.5607<br />
Gold &#8211; $923 (up $10)<br />
Oil &#8211; $124.08 (down $2.69)<br />
Gasoline &#8211; $3.07 (down $0.07)   </font></strong></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.economyguy.com/governments-gdp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.economyguy.com @ 2012-02-08 07:34:57 -->
